Revisiting the Great Ormond Street Hospital protocol for ward decannulation of children with tracheostomy.

INTRODUCTION: Tracheostomy decannulation is an important and final step in managing patients once the underlying issue requiring a tracheostomy resolves. However, no consensus exists on the optimal method to decannulate a paediatric patient. We revisit the Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) tracheostomy decannulation protocol, a 5-day process involving downsizing the tracheostomy tube, capping, and observation, to evaluate its effectiveness and assess if changes to the protocol are required. METHOD: This is a retrospective study, reviewing patient records between April 2018 and April 2023 from a single quaternary care centre. Data extracted include comorbidities, age at the time of decannulation, duration of tracheostomy, reason for tracheostomy insertion, whether a decannulation attempt was successful or not, and the timings of decannulation failure. RESULTS: 66 patients that met the selection criteria underwent a decannulation trial between April 2018 and April 2023. 32 patients were male, and 34 patients were female. Age at attempted decannulations ranged from 1 year to 18 years, with an average age of 6.1 years. There were a total of 93 attempts at decannulation, with 51 (54.8%) successful attempts, 35 (56.5%) first decannulation attempt successes, and 42 (45.2%) unsuccessful attempts. 17 patients had 2 attempts at decannulation, and 4 patients had 3 or more attempts at decannulation. Of the unsuccessful attempts, patients mostly failed on capping of the tracheostomy tube with 33 failures (35.5%). CONCLUSION: The GOSH protocol achieved similar success rates to comparable protocols. The protocol's multi-step approach provides thorough evaluation and support for patients during the decannulation process, and its success on a complex patient cohort supports its continued use.

Omental infarction mimicking acute appendicitis with negative radiological findings.

A male in his 30s presented to the emergency department with a 1-day history of supra-umbilical pain migrating to the right iliac fossa. On examination, his abdomen was soft but tender with localised guarding in the right iliac fossa and a positive Rovsing's sign. The patient was admitted under a presumptive diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A CT scan and ultrasound scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed no acute intra-abdominal pathology. He stayed in hospital for 2 days for observation without improvement of symptoms. A diagnostic laparoscopy was therefore performed that revealed an infarcted omentum adherent to the abdominal wall and ascending colon causing congestion of the appendix. The infarcted omentum was resected, and the appendix was removed. The CT images were reviewed by multiple consultant radiologists, but no positive findings were appreciated. This case report demonstrates the potential difficulty in diagnosing omental infarction clinically and radiologically.